Risk Scores
The problem
Security teams are overwhelmed by scanner output, yet still lack a reliable way to decide what needs to be fixed and what must be fixed first. CVSS describes inherent severity, not real-world risk, which is why one "High" severity vulnerability does not equal another.
EPSS estimates the chance of exploitation, but it depends on incomplete analysis data, resulting in delayed and inaccurate signals when timeliness and accuracy matter most. KEV provides a clear flag for known exploited vulnerabilities, but misses vulnerabilities that are not exploited yet, but likely will be.
The solution
Volerion delivers instant, justifiable, and context-aware risk scoring built for quick response to high-risk threats. Rather than waiting for public intel, we independently and automatically analyze CVEs. For each vulnerability, we gather and verify details about the issue itself, the affected products, and all viable remediations.
Every CVE receives eight categorical scores: spread, exploitability, relevance, urgency, impact, remediation, threat, and incentive. These categories are based on product popularity and exposure, attack requirements and consequences, vendor urgency, exploit maturity, and attacker incentive. All combined to form a final, generic risk score.
Example (CVE-2025-7038)
Volerion provides eight categorical risk scores for every CVE, combining threat intelligence with contextual analysis. Each category is independently scored and justified, giving you complete visibility into what makes a vulnerability risky.